<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>Plant Process and Function</title>
<title_fa>فرآیند و کارکرد گیاهی</title_fa>
<short_title>Journal of Plant Process and Function</short_title>
<subject>Agriculture</subject>
<web_url>http://jispp.iut.ac.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2322-2727</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2383-3688</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.22034</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1402</year>
	<month>6</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2023</year>
	<month>9</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>12</volume>
<number>55</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>The effect of mycorrhizal fungi on the yield and active ingredient of Borage (Borago officinails L.) under water deficit stressL.) under water deficit stress</title_fa>
	<title>The effect of mycorrhizal fungi on the yield and active ingredient of Borage (Borago officinails L.) under water deficit stress</title>
	<subject_fa>تنش خشكي</subject_fa>
	<subject>Droughts Stress</subject>
	<content_type_fa>كاربردي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Applicable</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;In order to evaluate the effect of mycorrhizal fungi on the yield and active ingredient of borage (&lt;i&gt;Borago officinails L.&lt;/i&gt;) under water deficit stress, the experiment conducted as split-plot in randomized complete block design with 3 replications in the Boyerahmad region at year 2015. The experiment factors were considered of irrigation levels (main-plot) as irrigation after S&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; =30, S&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; =60, S&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; =90, S&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; =120 and S&lt;sub&gt;5&lt;/sub&gt; =150 mm water evaporation from evaporation pan class A and mycorrhiza fungi (sub-plot) were considered at the levels of non application (NM), application with mycorrhiza fungi species of &lt;i&gt;Glomus mosseae&lt;/i&gt; (GM) and &lt;i&gt;Glomus intraradices &lt;/i&gt;(GI). The results showed that the effect of water stress on flower yield of borage was significant at level 1% and in the treatment 30 mm evaporation was obtained the highest yield of flower (188.9 kg/ha). The most flower yield was obtained in application treatments of mycorrhizal fungus &lt;i&gt;G. Mossea&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;G. intraradices&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;respectively with flower yield 147.2 and 145.5 kg/ha compared to &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;non application of&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt; mycorrhizal fungus. The interaction of water stress and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;mycorrhiza&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt; fungi on &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;phytochemistry&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt; traits of mucilage weight and mucilage percent of flower borage was significant at level 1%. The treatments S&lt;sub&gt;30&lt;/sub&gt;N.G, S&lt;sub&gt;30&lt;/sub&gt;GM, S&lt;sub&gt;30&lt;/sub&gt;GI, S&lt;sub&gt;90&lt;/sub&gt;N.G, S&lt;sub&gt;90&lt;/sub&gt;GM and S&lt;sub&gt;90&lt;/sub&gt;GI respectively with the weight of flower mucilage 11.77, 12.47, 12.06, 10.32, 12.34 and 11.78 kg/ha with the highest value were in first class (A). Treatments S&lt;sub&gt;30&lt;/sub&gt;N.G, S&lt;sub&gt;30&lt;/sub&gt;GM, S&lt;sub&gt;30&lt;/sub&gt;GI, S&lt;sub&gt;60&lt;/sub&gt;N.G, S&lt;sub&gt;60&lt;/sub&gt;GM, S&lt;sub&gt;60&lt;/sub&gt;GI, S&lt;sub&gt;90&lt;/sub&gt;GM, S&lt;sub&gt;90&lt;/sub&gt;GI and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;S&lt;sub&gt;120&lt;/sub&gt;GM &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;respectively with flower phosphorus content 268.4, 290.1, 275.6, 253.9, 252.9, 282.9, 268.9, 192.4 and 174.3 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;ppm&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt; had the highest amount. The treatments S&lt;sub&gt;90&lt;/sub&gt;GM and S&lt;sub&gt;90&lt;/sub&gt;GI respectively with water use efficiency 0.0178 and 0.0176 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;3 &lt;/sup&gt;had the highest amount. The application of mycorrhizal fungi&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;generally reduced the negative effects of water stress in this study and could increase flower yield, water use efficiency, percentage and weight of flower mucilage of borage in this research.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;In order to evaluate the effect of mycorrhizal fungi on the yield and active ingredient of borage (&lt;i&gt;Borago officinails L.&lt;/i&gt;) under water deficit stress, the experiment conducted as split-plot in randomized complete block design with 3 replications in the Boyerahmad region at year 2015. The experiment factors were considered of irrigation levels (main-plot) as irrigation after S&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; =30, S&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; =60, S&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; =90, S&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; =120 and S&lt;sub&gt;5&lt;/sub&gt; =150 mm water evaporation from evaporation pan class A and mycorrhiza fungi (sub-plot) were considered at the levels of non application (NM), application with mycorrhiza fungi species of &lt;i&gt;Glomus mosseae&lt;/i&gt; (GM) and &lt;i&gt;Glomus intraradices &lt;/i&gt;(GI). The results showed that the effect of water stress on flower yield of borage was significant at level 1% and in the treatment 30 mm evaporation was obtained the highest yield of flower (188.9 kg/ha). The most flower yield was obtained in application treatments of mycorrhizal fungus &lt;i&gt;G. Mossea&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;G. intraradices&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;respectively with flower yield 147.2 and 145.5 kg/ha compared to &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;non application of&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt; mycorrhizal fungus. The interaction of water stress and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;mycorrhiza&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt; fungi on &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;phytochemistry&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt; traits of mucilage weight and mucilage percent of flower borage was significant at level 1%. The treatments S&lt;sub&gt;30&lt;/sub&gt;N.G, S&lt;sub&gt;30&lt;/sub&gt;GM, S&lt;sub&gt;30&lt;/sub&gt;GI, S&lt;sub&gt;90&lt;/sub&gt;N.G, S&lt;sub&gt;90&lt;/sub&gt;GM and S&lt;sub&gt;90&lt;/sub&gt;GI respectively with the weight of flower mucilage 11.77, 12.47, 12.06, 10.32, 12.34 and 11.78 kg/ha with the highest value were in first class (A). Treatments S&lt;sub&gt;30&lt;/sub&gt;N.G, S&lt;sub&gt;30&lt;/sub&gt;GM, S&lt;sub&gt;30&lt;/sub&gt;GI, S&lt;sub&gt;60&lt;/sub&gt;N.G, S&lt;sub&gt;60&lt;/sub&gt;GM, S&lt;sub&gt;60&lt;/sub&gt;GI, S&lt;sub&gt;90&lt;/sub&gt;GM, S&lt;sub&gt;90&lt;/sub&gt;GI and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;S&lt;sub&gt;120&lt;/sub&gt;GM &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;respectively with flower phosphorus content 268.4, 290.1, 275.6, 253.9, 252.9, 282.9, 268.9, 192.4 and 174.3 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;ppm&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt; had the highest amount. The treatments S&lt;sub&gt;90&lt;/sub&gt;GM and S&lt;sub&gt;90&lt;/sub&gt;GI respectively with water use efficiency 0.0178 and 0.0176 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;3 &lt;/sup&gt;had the highest amount. The application of mycorrhizal fungi&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot; style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;generally reduced the negative effects of water stress in this study and could increase flower yield, water use efficiency, percentage and weight of flower mucilage of borage in this research.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa>Flower phosphorus, Flower yield, Mucilage, Water use efficiency</keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Flower phosphorus, Flower yield, Mucilage, Water use efficiency</keyword>
	<start_page>51</start_page>
	<end_page>64</end_page>
	<web_url>http://jispp.iut.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-796-2&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Ali</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Rahimi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>Ali</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>Rahimi</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>rahimi.ali1362@yahoo.com</email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid></orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Forests, pastures and watershed research department, Research and Education Center for Agriculture and Natural Resources of Kohgilooyeh and Boyerahmad Province, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Yasouj, Iran </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>Forests, pastures and watershed research department, Research and Education Center for Agriculture and Natural Resources of Kohgilooyeh and Boyerahmad Province, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Yasouj, Iran</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Shahrokh</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Jahanbin</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>Shahrokh</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>Jahanbin</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid></orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Amin </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Salehi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>Amin</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>Salehi</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid></orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Hooshang </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Farajee</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>Hooshang</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>Farajee</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid></orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
